


The need for a network
The target audience
The structure of a Special Interest Network
Management responsibilities
A viable option?
Examples
References cited
It has been asserted many times over by speakers at the symposium that there is an urgent need for the ongoing exchange of information and for a repository of relevant data. We believe that the proposed Special Interest Network will satisfy that need.
This paper is based on various discussions held in San Francisco and provides a structured approach to initiate and stimulate discussion on future transnational co-operation and information exchange. The occurrence of diasters ignores state and international boundaries, and the magnitude of most disasters stretches resources beyond limits of self-reliance.
Responsible management is based on informed decisions - the better the information available, the better the decisions are likely to be. To achieve this, the relevant managers commonly draw on three sources:
The need for up-to-date information on management options, conservation teatments, case studies and the like cannot be satisfied in a rush by traditional means once a disaster has struck. However, it can be satisfied if an information network has been established which serves all involved and which is fed by a wide range of contributors.
Building inspectors
Cultural heritage managers
Federal/State disaster and emergency managers
Fire officials
Historical architects
Local government officials
Local preservation staff
Park Service preservation specialists
Park Service superintendents
Park Service wild fire/bush fire managers
SHPO staff
Structural engineers
Town planners
The proposed SIN is not intended to replace the skills of professionals, such as building code inspectors or historic architects. On the contrary, it is intended to provide a conceptual framework within which these professionals can share their experiences and access a vast amount of relevant information.
There is a growing trend in many areas of research towards large-scale projects and studies that involve contributions from many sources (Green 1993a). Also, there is no need for a "publication" to be stored all in one place. For instance, acting independently, many Web sites have put together national or regional guides. Many of these documents, such as the Guide to Australia integrate information from many different sources. In turn, these documents are now themselves being merged to form encyclopaedic information bases, such as the Virtual Tourist.
There are also great advantages in publishing raw data, as well as the conclusions of scientific studies. In many cases, data that are gathered for one purpose can be "recycled" and, combined with other data, add value to related studies.
A Special Interest Network (SIN) is a group of people and/or institutions who collaborate to provide information about a particular subject. The main functions of a SIN fall into the following four headings:
Publication
Virtual Library
On-line Services
Communications
SINs consist of a series of participating "nodes" that each contribute to the network's functions. More specifically, the nodes carry one or more of the following:
Accept and store relevant,
contributed material;
Provide some form of public access for users;
Provide some unique information, or mirror other sites;
Provide organised links to other nodes;
Co-ordinate their activity with other nodes.
For research activity, SINs are the modern equivalent of learned societies. Some may even be the communications medium for societies (for example Burdet, 1992). We can also consider SINs as a logical extension of newsgroups and bulletin boards; namely, they aim to provide a complete working environment for their members and users. SINs differ from SIGs ("special interest groups") in two important ways. Firstly, SIGs are usually part of larger organisations. The second, and greater, distinction lies in the use of networks. Whereas a group usually has a focus, SINs are explicitly decentralised.
A good example of a SIN is the European Molecular Biology Network. EMBNet is a special interest network that serves the European molecular biology and biotechnology research community. It consists of nodes operated by biologically oriented centers in different European countries. It features a number of services and activities, especially genomic databases such as EMBL (Cameron, 1988).
The following features characterise most large special interest networks. They also provide guidelines for setting one up.
Need
Co-ordination
Support
Participation
Access
Standards
Format
Quality control
Attribution
Agreements
Automation
Further, more detailed information on Special Interest Networks can be found in Green 1994.
The Americas
Australasia and Oceania
Europe/Africa
logical structure of the on-line information;
separation of function between the sites involved;
attribute standards for submissions (see below);
protocols for submission of entries, corrections, etc.;
quality control criteria and procedures (see below);
protocols for on-line searching of the databases;
protocols for "mirroring" the data sets.
For instance, an international natural hazard mitigation database project might consist of agreements on the above points by a set or participating sites ("nodes"). Contributors could submit their entries to any node and each node would either "mirror" the others or else provide on-line links to them.
Many organisations are adopting the de facto SINs approach as suggested here. For example:
The Biodiversity Information Network (BIN21),
which is located at http://www.ftpt.br/bin21/bin21.html
FireNet,
with CSU's node at http://www.csu.edu.au/firenet/
Charles Sturt University
(http://www.csu.edu.au/) is implementing SINs to support a
wide range of interests, especially in education and research.
[Top of page]
[Return to Table of Contents]


Document version:1.0.6
Document created: August 9, 1995
Document last updated: October 23, 1997
Maintained by: © Dirk H. R. Spennemann , e-mail,
dspennemann@csu.edu.au

